My brain spends a lot of its free time trying various algorithms that will help explain reality and make some kind of sense out the world and the meaning of life. So far I haven’t really come to any definitive conclusions, but certain ancillary insights do arise out of this activity from time to time in the same way that the manned moon mission led to the development of Pop Tarts and Teflon. For example, its become quite clear to me that sugared breakfast cereals aren’t really good for you no matter how many vitamins they spray onto them and that 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by some of the most fiendish villains ever to disgrace our planet. More on these topics some other time perhaps.
Last week when we were coming back from Dharamsala, we were discussing how history had repeated itself in a certain street-con that we had essentially fallen prey to there just as we had several months ago while visiting Pushkar in Rajasthan. During our conversation on this topic a notion about how Indians organise themselves and how it differs from Westerners came to mind. First the con story.
As soon as we walked out of our hotel in Dharamsala, a young local
entrepreneur with a shoeshine kit requested to shine my shoes. The fact that I was wearing grey suede Vans should have been a tip-off that either he was not very experienced in dealing with footwear or did not have my best interest in mind. For some reason, I found his insistence so stupidly charming, I agreed to let him work on my sneakers. Despite my supervision, he pretty much ruined my shoes, trying to wax the suede and then purposely tearing the heal so he could do me a favour by fixing it. I could always buy a new pair I reasoned. When I went to pay him (for the job of ruining my shoes which were also much dirtier than before I had put them in his care), he gave some unintelligible reason for not wanting cash but instead wanted me to buy him some goods at a local shop.
Having been in India now for 8 months, I have learned a couple things:
- Anyone that walks up to you on the streets with some kind of offer is probably trying to scam you in some way
- Anyone whose business model is not structured normally right up front, “I will provide you with X service/product for Rs. Y” has got a major con going, you better hold on to your wallet and run as fast as you can
My shoeshine boy who introduced himself as Vijay was in the second category. When he declined my generous offer of Rs. 100 for destroying my $60 Vans, I put the money back in my pocket and told him to let me know if he changed his mind. He and a friend that had suddenly appeared then followed us down the street as we tried to casually look in the shops. Curiously, Vijay’s friend was also named Vijay and while Vijay #1 walked with me trying to engage in a conversation about how poor he was, Vijay #2 was plying Mrs. WMG with a similar story.
Now I am as compassionate as the next guy and probably a little more so, but I’m also experienced enough to tell the difference between someone who needs my help and someone who wants to use my compassion like a crowbar into my pocket. So, when Vijay and his other brother Vijay ran into a shop we were passing and started holding up bags of rice like they were models on “The Price is Right”, I summoned the shopkeeper, handed him Vijay’s Rs. 100 and told him to let them have anything they wanted in his store.
Apparently people the Vijay twins have identified as “stupid Americans carrying money that rightfully belongs to them” do not normally do this. Instead of going on a shopping spree, Vijay #1 got into a rather agitated state and chased us down the street explaining all the while how this was not the way the game was played. Eventually I had to get quite stroppy with him in explaining that his quarrel was now with the shopkeeper who was holding his 100 Rupees and not me. This all pretty much set the tone for our visit in Dharamsala.
An Insight
As I mentioned several paragraphs ago, in discussing this in the car on the way to the Dharamsala airport a thought about Indian organisation occurred to me. This seems pretty unrelated now, but it made sense then. For months Mrs. WMG and I have been trying to introduce business processes into the company that we are working for here. Generally, this effort has met with one of two results, failure and utter failure (there have also been a couple of cases of ignominious failure but these were isolated incidents).
What occurred to me in the car as we careened down the mountainside without the benefit of seatbelts, is that this is a culture organised around status. Tasks are assigned to people based on their position, their social status or their business status. For example, some of my colleagues never ever carry their own briefcase from the parking lot to their second-floor office, this is always done by one of the uniformed walas in the building. In a society or company where activities are inextricable from job and level, trying to introduce a process that doesn’t revolve around people’s status is just too abstract a concept for many people to grok. Similarly, being blind to levels and protocols, creating a process around people’s status makes no sense to us whatsoever.
I’m not sure I’ve explained this well, but since I blathered on endlessly about the Vijay bothers and their antics, I ran past by brother-in-law Trevor’s attention span and must draw a line under this entry here. I will try and pick this up again sometime.

Hi,
I found your website while searching for ‘Dharamsala’ on blogs.
Talking about the Shoeshine boy, you mention about your ‘generous’ offer of Rs.100; Hopefully, you would now be aware that your offer was way too ‘generous’. Any Indian would not give more than Rs.10, while showcasing the best of generosity there.
Secondly, you mentioned about your colleagues not carrying their own luggage from the parking lot to their offices. This is, I dare say, of what today remains of the Raj. Irony is, you are today condemning a practice that your ancestors left us with. I am not aware if you know of their antics well. But you rightly point it out here, and what wrong is wrong.
Your website and your writings are interesting and I cherished reading it here. I would come back again
meanwhile, feel free to visit my website sometime!
Meanwhile, Have a good time here
Steve:
Do you really think 911 was an inside job? Have you looked at the evidence? Did you read the 911 report? I am perplexed that this conspiracy is so widespread. Other then that I enjoy your writings.
Ben
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for visiting and your comment, I’m glad you enjoyed the blog.
I think alternative explanations for 911 are so widespread because many people, myself included, just can’t get comfortable with the official version of the story. I think everyone can agree that some guys with little regard for human life, a crazed thirst for power that stretches any sane person’s imagination, and a desire to change the course of world history planned and executed this atrocity. The question would then be, who?
For better or worse, my mum raised me to question authority. This caused me no end of trouble in school and generally makes me a huge pain in the ass as an employee (oops, there go my future job prospects – hope my recruiters don’t read this). It’s not that I don’t believe what I’m told, it’s just that it has to pass an extra filter before I do. There is no shortage on the web of information and propaganda on this topic, I don’t have much to add to it. Just these two points that I don’t see discussed much:
1. There are a lot of things that happen in this world that I don’t really understand. I think a good place to start figuring them out is to ask, “who benefited?”
2. In Christian evangelism they have this saying that goes something like, “You may not be sure about it, but if the Bible’s story is true, then it is of the utmost importance that you consider it.” I would say the same thing about the alternative explanations to 911. We had all better hope that they are a lot of hooey, I sure do. But if there is even a slim chance that they aren’t, we damn well better consider them.
Hi Truman,
Thanks for visiting and leaving your comments.
Actually I knew at the time that Rs. 100 was overly generous. It would too complicated to fully explain how we view these kinds of things but a simple explanation might go like this: as visitors here who can afford it, we have a certain social obligation to help where we can. Money almost never truly helps but sometimes it is the best you can do.
Cheers.
Steve:
I have spend a lot of time researching this issue myself. I am one to question anything and everything. I also also one to look for the answers. It is harder then ever to find out what is true even in the information age. I simply don’t see the government as competent enough to do anything right! For anyone to orchestrate something like 911 it would require everyone on every level of government to be in on it. It would be nice to think there was a hand controlling everything in clandestine. The Corruption and incompetence in our government is a very real thing. The facts speak for themselves check out some of the links below if you have some free time.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017&q=judy+woods&total=152&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7430656232864058253&q=mark+roberts&total=408&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
http://www.debunking911.com/
Benjamin,
You know, you are going to start attracting 911 fanatics to might sight with those links don’t you? Oh well.
Your government competence point is well taken, looking at the economy, the Iraq war, the international prestige and moral standing of the country and the Katrina aftermath one might come to the conclusion that this is the biggest bunch of knuckleheads ever to run any country, much less the good old USA. How could they possibly pull off a fraud of the magnitude required for a 911 “inside job”?
Yet still there are so many unanswered questions, information that’s never been released, strange coincidences and things that just don’t make sense. Moreover, there’s no way that these clowns are as stupid as they seem to be. These are the most powerful men in the world, with assets, influence and connections, and not to mention cunning and desire, that neither you nor I could imagine. Now, maybe some equally determined guy in a cave and a handful of his two-digit IQ followers really did (and continues to) outsmart them. But I don’t think that makes much sense.
I think what you have to do is let yourself think the unthinkable for a few minutes – that’s a very scary thing to do. When you come back from there, and you should because I don’t think anyone would like to stay there very long, if you still think the official story is sensible, holds water, stands up to scrutiny and has been thoroughly explained, OK fair enough. But if you come back and, like me, say, “Hey wait a minute, something’s not right here”, then I think you need to join with the rest of the conspiracy kooks until we get to the bottom of it.
As I suggested the last time, if I’m wrong about this, it’s pretty harmless mental masturbation with all the fun and fulfilment that goes along with that. But if the worst case scenario is right, hooey, do we have a problem.
Thanks for the links.